03Transition

Download report

 

 

The availability of flood insurance in a post-Flood Re market will depend on progress being made across three areas, which Flood Re terms ‘buckets’:

Reducing the risk of flooding. Reducing the cost of flooding. Achieving an effective market for flood insurance

Within this there are a wide range of drivers and determinants, mostly outside of Flood Re’s direct control. Since 2020, Flood Re has used a set of indicators to track progress on each of these issues. As part of our wider commitment to transparency, each year Flood Re updates our assessment of these indicators to set-out our view as to whether sufficient progress is being made in each of the three buckets below to ensure flood insurance remains widely available post-2039

While the 2024 update does include some positive developments, the most significant developments this year have been negative. Inflation is the biggest issue, resulting in a significant downturn on the returns on investment in flood defences and huge rises in the costs of flood claims. At the same time progress at reducing climate change seems to be insufficient and a high-number of natural catastrophes around the world, most likely linked to climate change, means that the costs of reinsurance – which UK insurers would need to purchase in a market without Flood Re – have risen sharply.

 

 
 

Flood Re Academy

Launched in April 2025 the Flood Re Academy is a dedicated educational resource designed to improve understanding of the Scheme and Build Back Better initiative. Aimed at insurers, policymakers, and wider stakeholders, the Academy features five specially created modules which cover what Flood Re is, how/why it was set up, the eligibility criteria, Build Back Better, using outside spaces to reduce flood risk as well as how the Scheme has, and is, evolving.

Accredited by the Chartered Insurance Institute (CII) and the Chartered Institute of Loss Adjusters (CILA), the Academy also counts towards users’ Continuing Professional Development (CPD), offering structured learning that supports professional growth. As part of Flood Re’s wider transition plans, it plays a key role in preparing the market for a future without the Scheme in 2039.

 

 

2025 Transition Indicators

Flood Re’s ‘Transition Indicators’ identify the drivers and determinants of future flood risk insurance availability. These encompass a wide range of macro factors, covering public policy, global trends, market conditions and technological change. As part of our wider commitment to transparency, each year Flood Re updates our assessment of these indicators to set out our view as to the direction of travel. In other words, have the changes that we have witnessed over the past year improved – or worsened – the long-term prospects for flood insurance availability.

The 2025 indicators identify a range of changes, often pulling in different directions. In terms of public policy changes, there has been a significant increase in flood defence funding, combined with commitments to reform of how this is spent. However, the Climate Change Committee’s Adaptation Progress Report is the most pessimistic to date, highlighting a lack of systemic approach to climate change adaptation. Viewed through the lens of insurability, there is growing pressure on the insurance markets created by increasing and better identified risk, in the UK and around the world.  This highlights the need to ensure that there are mechanisms to ensure increased investment in physical resilience can lead to improvements in financial resilience.

 

Bucket one

Reducing the risk of flooding

The first set of indicators Flood Re assesses are the macro factors which will determine the overall level of flood risk in the UK. These are outside the control of Flood Re, and are largely determined by public policy decisions in the UK and abroad. This year we have seen a range of significant developments, both positive and negative. In June 2025, the UK Government announced their future spending plans, which included a very significant commitment to flood defence spending in England. However, the Environment Agency’s National assessment of flood and coastal erosion risk in England 2024 (Nafra2), showed that the number of at-risk properties in England is significantly higher than previously thought, and also set out estimates for how this number will rise further due to climate change. Flood resilience is a central part of the broader climate change adaptation strategy and the Climate Change Committee concluded, in its  2025 Adaptation Progress Report, that “the UK’s preparations for climate change are inadequate”.

Dial key:

2024
2025
  • Indicator one

    Investing in flood risk management and defences

    In England, the previous Government had announced spending £5.2B on flood defences in England from 2021-2027, a 54% real-terms increase in funding compared with the period 2015-21. The new Government enhanced this further to £2.65B over 2 years to March 2026, which represented a record annual amount. This was followed in June 2025 by an announcement of £4.2B over 3 years for further defences. The Government has also announced a consultation on the flood formula that is expected to enhance delivery of small schemes, natural flood management, Property Flood Resilience, and maintenance. Our work this year included analysis of the continued value of flood defences, in collaboration with Fathom and addresscloud, which showed that the fluvial flood protection prevents £1.15B in residential property damage every year (a figure that would be in excess of £2B if taking into account all types of property and flood defences).

    A lack of equivalent data makes it hard to track progress in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The Scottish Government has published its National Flood Resilience Strategy, which focuses on  living with water and prioritising resilience over protection. Though resilience is important, it should complement, not replace, the need for proper flood defences. The lack of clarity on what is being spent or what is being delivered remains a concern across the devolved nations.

  • Indicator two

    Development with flood risk in mind

    The Government in England has not published statistics on the number of properties built on the flood plain since 2022. The last updated set of statistics, for 2021-22, show that in England 7% of new residential addresses were in Flood Zone 3, which is described as “the Environment Agency’s best estimate of the areas of land at risk of flooding, when the presence of flood defences are ignored and covers land with a 1 in 100 (1%) or greater chance of flooding each year from Rivers; or with a 1 in 200 (0.5%) or greater chance of flooding each year from the Sea.” If these rates continue as housebuilding increases, this will represent a large increase in the number of homes at flood risk.

    Schedule 3 of the Flood & Water Management Act 2010 was due to be implemented by December 2024 but has been delayed and now may not be implemented at all[1][2]. This would have required sustainable urban drainage systems as part of new developments, with local arrangements to ensure these were appropriate and included a commitments to have these maintained and then adopted by risk management authorities. Equivalent arrangements are already in place for Wales.

    The UK Government’s Planning and Infrastructure Bill has not strengthened flood protections in the planning process, while the updated National Planning Policy Framework references SUDS, but without implementing the stronger mandatory requirements of Schedule 3. The National Infrastructure Commission has recommended the Government update planning guidance to “require planning authorities to ensure that from 2026 all new development is resilient to flooding from rivers with an annual likelihood of 0.5 per cent for its lifetime and does not increase risk elsewhere”. No action has been taken to implement this recommendation.

    [1] 27 November 2023 – Public Accounts Committee – Oral evidence session – Committees – UK Parliament

    [2] Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Twelfth sitting) – Hansard – UK Parliament

  • Indicator three

    Adapting to climate change

    2024 was the hottest year ever recorded and the first year to exceed the 1.5⁰C warming threshold, with the global average temperate 1.6⁰C above pre-industrial levels. Atmospheric CO2 concentrations reached a new peak after the fastest rise on record between 2023 and 2024 and are projected to continue to rise in 2025, albeit a smaller increase due to natural sinks. Emissions globally are currently trending above both the RCP 2.6 pathway (which would mean achievement of the Paris Climate Change Agreement to limit global warming to 1.5⁰C) and the RCP 4.5 (which would mean missing them – currently most closely aligned to this path). There is still time to implement policies to avert the worst implications of climate change. But limiting warming to even 2°C at this stage will require rapid, deep and in most cases immediate greenhouse emission reductions which are not being seen globally. Global temperature rises above 1.5⁰C would make it significantly more difficult – and expensive – for the UK to adapt to global warming.

    The third National Adaptation Programme was published in July of 2023, representing the Government’s overarching national adaptation strategy, this is updated every five years. The assessment of the Office for Environmental Protection in its 2025 annual progress report continued its 2024 assessment that plans on both adaptation and mitigation continue to show limited progress and remain largely off track (red rating), while the Climate Change Committee’s 2025 Progress in adapting to climate change report to Parliament found that “The Government has yet to change the UK’s inadequate approach to tackling climate risks”.

Bucket two

Reducing the damage and costs of flooding

The second set of indicators Flood Re assesses relate to the costs of flooding. Recognising that it will never be possible to eliminate the risk of floods entirely, future insurability will also require us to reduce the damage done by these floods when they occur, and the costs of repairing this damage. Flood Re’s transition activities tend to focus in these areas. Our initiatives this year have included an Expert Group on the future of PFR, which looked at which properties would be most suitable for PFR, while our Build Back Better initiative aims to ensure flooded properties are rebuilt in a way that reduces their vulnerability to future floods.

Last year’s 2023-24 assessment was that both positive and negative factors were increasing in parallel: programs to help householders reduce their flood risk increased, but alongside a greater level of costs and damages. The 2024-25 year saw parallel easing resulting in little change in all categories: there were fewer major flood events and less damage, but progress on household resilience similarly slowed. The average cost of home insurance flood claims in 2024 and 2025 has ranged between about £60,000 and £90,000, depending on the event, with alternative accommodation costs playing a significant role.  With BBB uptake at roughly 1/3 of properties accepting flood measures, and cost of claims and damages growing.

Dial key:

2024
2025
  • Indicator four

    Improving flood resilience products

    Flood Re’s Build Back Better initiative went live in 2023/24 with insurers joining the initiative at various points since. This will significantly increase the demand for flood resilience products in the UK. The Environment Agency’s (EA) second PFR framework remains in force, providing the framework through which both the EA and local authorities procure PFR for homes. After nearly 3 years in which no new products received certification to the British Standard, one company had three of its products certified, assisted through a Knowledge Transfer Partnership with a local university, providing a minor positive for the product innovation and certification ecosystem. There were no significant company entrances or exits from the market. Overall, no significant changes were observed – costs remained high and the industry has yet to be mainstreamed. The Environment Agency commissioned the FloodProof review led by Professor Peter Bonfield to provide recommendations to help mainstream PFR, with the review expected to report in autumn 2025. The International PFR Association (IPFRA) was formed, creating a strategic industry voice. These major initiatives are opportunities to make considerable progress in this area in the future.

  • Indicator five

    Improving the overall resilience of the UK’s housing

    In last year’s indicators, Flood Re highlighted the implementation of Build Back Better (BBB) and the EA’s new PFR framework (as above) as causes for optimism. Both of these programs remain in place, but are not leading to the increases in resilience that had been envisaged. For BBB, this is because of the good fortune of relatively low-levels of flooding, but also because take-up of BBB by householders remains at around 1/3rd of those offered. The EA’s PFR framework has significantly expanded the envelope of funding available for PFR, but as of yet there is no evidence that this and record levels of flood defence spending overall, has led to increased installation of PFR. There is no central program for supporting property resilience in Wales, Northern Ireland or Scotland, though in Scotland we are aware of several local authorities attempting to establish PFR programs.

    The UK Government has commissioned Prof Peter Bonfield to undertake a review of Property Flood Resilience in the UK. Flood Re hopes this will improve the utilisation of PFR within England’s flood resilience program.

  • Indicator six

    Improving community flood preparedness and resilience

    Flood Re has undertaken a number of initiatives during 2024/25 to raise awareness of flood risk and how it can be mitigated this includes the  Flood Resilient Garden which was presented at Chelsea Flower Show. The garden explained how householders could use their garden to reduce their flood risk, and the publicity generated reached millions of people. Awareness initiatives targeted particular geographical areas, including the January 2025 launch of ‘Flo’ the flood bus in conjunction with the Scottish Flood Forum. This will tour flood affected communities demonstrating how householders can improve their resilience to flooding.

    As of March 2024, 1.58M properties were registered to receive the environment Agency’s free flood alerts (see S17 report section 6.2.2), which was 40,000 more than the previous year (but a slower pace of increase, as 110,000 had signed up in the previous year). Despite this, no major new indications of flood awareness have emerged, since the previous year when a survey for the ‘Be Flood Smart’ campaign found just 24% of respondents at ‘high’ flood risk correctly identifying their risk. More action is needed, by both public bodies and the insurance sector to inform householders about their risk.

  • Indicator seven

    Minimising the cost of reinstatement

    The cost of reinstating a home after flooding is dependent on the costs of material, labour and alternative accommodation. In 2024, rebuild costs showed a second consecutive year of levelled-off growth in the 2% range (2.3% in the year to Q1-2025)  after the 20% rise in 2022.

    Cost rises (including rebuild costs and alternative/rental accommodation costs, with the latter having seen considerable rises in recent years) saw more than a 50% increase in Flood Re’s average cost of a claim between Storms Ciara and Denis in 2021 and Storm Babet in 2023. That cost has remained stubbornly high – the average cost of home insurance flood claims in 2024 and 2025 has ranged between about £60,000 and £90,000, depending on the event.

    Analysis undertaken by Flood Re and Verisk last year estimated that UK insurers will pay out £2bn to repair flooded homes in the UK over the subsequent five years. This was further supplemented with research released in January 2025 in conjunction with Fathom and addresscloud showing that average annual damages to residential properties by flooding of £640M. This – and the rising premium costs noted in the next bucket – show insurers and householders need to be doing more to contain costs.

Bucket three

Achieving an effective market

The third of Flood Re’s looks at whether we have an effective market prepared for Flood Re’s exit. Within this bucket, Flood Re looks at both insurers and consumers, and considers whether there are the structures in place to support a properly functioning market. To assess this, Flood Re considers the role of insurers, the collaboration between the sector and the private sector, the information available to householders and the role of Flood Re within the market.

This year we have seen significant improvements to the information available to consumers in England and more insurers offering Build Back Better to implement flood resilience measures as part of the post-flood recovery process. The UK remains a world leader in flood mapping, but Flood Re is concerned the degree to which these are able to incorporate flood resilience features, and householder awareness of flood risk remains low. Climate-related events globally continues to reshape international reinsurance markets, which would make it more expensive for our cedants to replace Flood Re’s capacity in a market without Flood Re.

Dial key:

2024
2025
  • Indicator eight

    Improved quality and use of flood models

    The UK remains a world-leader in flood modelling, in both the public and private sector. In 2024/25, the Environment Agency published the long-awaited updated National assessment of flood and coastal erosion risk . This represents significant progress in the granularity and detail of the publicly available information, and for the first time provides integrated surface water and fluvial risk, future flood risk due to climate, and flood depths – and it significantly updated the numbers of those at risk of flooding, to 6.3M properties from 5.2M/5.7M under the previous version. Flood Re is not aware of plans to publish equivalent detail in Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland.

    While flood maps are able to identify flood risk at an increasingly granular level, Flood Re remains concerned as to how effectively the maps are capturing the flood resilience features, particularly those at community level (including surface water alleviation) and household level. A failure to capture resilience features reduces private incentives to invest in resilience measures, as there is no corresponding increase in access to financial services. Flood Re is undertaking a programme of work alongside industry and academic partners to establish the methodology and standards for recording, scoring, and communicating resilience features.

  • Indicator nine

    An orderly Flood Re exit

    Flood Re continues to ensure the widespread availability and affordability of insurance: 98% of flood risk sample were able to get 15+ quotes from price comparison websites, and 99% of those with recent flood claims were able to get 5+ quotes. Inflation in the insurance market levelled off in 24/25, after a rise of nearly 40% in quoted prices during 2023/24.  Flood Re’s tracking of flood risk properties shows proportionate price increases for flood risk properties.

    The number of properties ceded to Flood Re increased significantly in 2024/25, with the number of properties reinsured through the Scheme rising by 20% to 347,000. This follows single-digit increases in ceding in previous years. This suggests growing reliance on the Scheme.

  • Indicator ten

    Improving consumer information on flooding and the value of insurance

    The biggest development in 2024-25 in the consumer information space is the publication of National assessment of flood and coastal erosion risk 2024 (also noted in indicator 8 above). This has provided significantly more information at household level. For the first time householders can access an integrated flood risk indication (combining surface water and fluvial risk), and be given an indication of likely flood depth.

    A Flood Re commissioned survey of UK householders found that 80% of households have insurance – 95% of owner-occupiers, and 53% of renters. The last major poll of the topic (2021) found that 91% of owner-occupiers, and 56% of renters, had insurance. Although Flood Re’s survey indicated that a small proportion (3-5%) had stopped obtaining insurance in recent years, overall figures for penetration remain broadly similar despite the considerable increase in prices observed between 2022 and 2024. There has been an observed move in the market to essentials products, but given flood cover is included as standard this still represents a market with significant coverage levels across the UK.

  • Indicator eleven

    Active engagement in the market, and insurers’ engagement with flood risk issues

    The number of insurers offering Build Back Better (BBB) has remained strong and growing, with 12 major insurance providers onboard who account for over 70% of the UK’s residential property insurance market.

    Global trends in reinsurance markets have continued to be a concern. Whilst natural catastrophe reinsurance pricing is now starting to soften again, following recent years of significant increases due to inflation and the growing increase in climate related disasters, Flood Re’s reinsurance costs have risen by more than £100m per annum as at 1st April 2025 compared to the previous reinsurance programme which was last purchased 3 years ago at the 1st April 2022. But were Flood Re not in existence, the tightening reinsurance market would have added pressure directly to insurers offering flood cover in the UK. As a result, household insurance prices have been partially insulated from costs that continue to rise for climate disasters globally, but this has come at a cost of heavier reliance on and exposures for the Flood Re scheme, as the increased ceding numbers in indicator nine demonstrate.

    Crucially and positively, there is still no evidence of insurers seeking to unbundle cover to remove flood protection, as has been seen in other countries. Our work this year has included a report looking at other schemes globally, seeking to understand those that have held up under pressure and ensure sustainability of the UK insurance market over the longer term.

 

Delivering on our key commitments

Since the Transition’s Plan launch, Flood Re has made significant progress in delivering our key commitments.

 

Flood Performance Certificates (FPCs)

The Flood Performance Certificate (FPC) project has made meaningful strides over the past year, setting the stage for a pivotal period ahead. In collaboration with Middlesex University, we advanced Phase 3 of our Scoring methodology for Property-Level Flood Resilience (PFR) measures – building on baseline modelling by analysing the relationship between key data points and damage-depth curves, differentiated by property type. These insights are foundational to the next phases: data standardisation and the integration of FPCs into the planning process. Following two competitive public tenders, we successfully appointed delivery partners for two projects:

Read moreRead less

  • RAB Consultants will lead the data standardisation project, which will define the minimum data requirements and develop a data collection template for issuing an FPC.
  • Ardent consulting engineers are leading the FPC in Planning project, which is exploring how the FPC can be embedded in the planning system. It will evaluate current compliance practices and assess how the FPC system can ensure that flood resilience measures are effectively implemented in new developments.

Both projects are now running concurrently with a targeted completion date of April 2026, and are linking with other workstreams such as the Bonfield review.

Town & Country Planning Association research

Flood Re commissioned the Town & Country Planning Association to undertake a deep dive study into flood risk and new development in the planning system, with a focus on the post-consent process. The resulting report, Delivering flood resilience through the planning system in England, released in September 2024, showed the ways in which flood risk is being accounted for, and failing to be accounted for, in the planning system. Centering on 2 case studies, the report showed that the evidence used in decision making was often incomplete and out of date, that the use of conditions in securing mitigations created vulnerabilities and often lack enforceability,  and that unclear roles and responsibilities and limited enforcement resulted in poor overall outcomes.

Analysis of International Pools

As concerns about de-insurance in other countries, and the rising costs of reinsurance internationally (see indicator 11 above) have come to the fore, Flood Re undertook a project to see how other natural catastrophe schemes are performing under pressure. Undertaken by Swiss Re solutions, the resulting Analysis of International Pools project provided a deep dive into the performance of 5 comparable schemes to Flood Re – a summary version of the report has been posted on our website. This will help to inform consideration of the scheme’s viability over time, and has provided background for consultations with international colleagues, as many countries continue to seek Flood Re’s advice on how to establish a market-led scheme that embeds resilience features like Build Back Better. In September 2025, the UK will host the meeting of the World Forum of Catastrophe Programmes, and this comparison work will help inform the discussion among international colleagues.

 

Bonfield Review

The FloodProof review, led by Professor Peter Bonfield, was commissioned by the Environment Agency to bring together different sectors to agree an approach to property-level flood resilience (PFR) in order to mainstream PFR and resilience in the built environment. Flood Re has been supporting the review’s secretariat, particularly in the areas of research, retrofits, and the evidence base supporting PFR (see Flood Performance Certificates – above), and acting as part of the review’s leadership group. The Review will report in autumn of 2025, at which time Flood Re will consider the report’s recommendations.

Value of Flood Defences and 2025 Spending Review

Flood Re has undertaken considerable research and advocacy to ensure that flood defences are a priority for government spending, as per Indicator 1 in the Transition leading indicators above. The absolute amount of risk in the UK has considerable bearing on the cost and ability to maintain insurability across the UK, and the agreement that created Flood Re committed government to spending on flood defences, with insurers providing the funding for Flood Re.

In the past, Flood Re has undertaken research into several different values of flood protection in the UK (see Reports section of our website). In late 2024, Flood Re commissioned Fathom to explore the value of flood defences to residential properties in the UK – recent commentary had focused on the inflation of costs of defences, but had not explored the increased cost of rebuilding and hence the greater value of those defences. The work, using data from addresscloud, found that fluvial/river flood defences save £1.15bn in UK residential property damage each year. This figure would be in excess of £2bn if taking into account all types of property (e.g. commercial and industrial) and flood defences (e.g. coastal and surface water). This analysis was submitted as independent evidence to inform the 2025 Spending Review.

Arrow-down