Flood Performance Certificates (FPCs)
The Flood Performance Certificate (FPC) project has made meaningful strides over the past year, setting the stage for a pivotal period ahead. In collaboration with Middlesex University, we advanced Phase 3 of our Scoring methodology for Property-Level Flood Resilience (PFR) measures – building on baseline modelling by analysing the relationship between key data points and damage-depth curves, differentiated by property type. These insights are foundational to the next phases: data standardisation and the integration of FPCs into the planning process. Following two competitive public tenders, we successfully appointed delivery partners for two projects:
- RAB Consultants will lead the data standardisation project, which will define the minimum data requirements and develop a data collection template for issuing an FPC.
- Ardent consulting engineers are leading the FPC in Planning project, which is exploring how the FPC can be embedded in the planning system. It will evaluate current compliance practices and assess how the FPC system can ensure that flood resilience measures are effectively implemented in new developments.
Both projects are now running concurrently with a targeted completion date of April 2026, and are linking with other workstreams such as the Bonfield review.
Town & Country Planning Association research
Flood Re commissioned the Town & Country Planning Association to undertake a deep dive study into flood risk and new development in the planning system, with a focus on the post-consent process. The resulting report, Delivering flood resilience through the planning system in England, released in September 2024, showed the ways in which flood risk is being accounted for, and failing to be accounted for, in the planning system. Centering on 2 case studies, the report showed that the evidence used in decision making was often incomplete and out of date, that the use of conditions in securing mitigations created vulnerabilities and often lack enforceability, and that unclear roles and responsibilities and limited enforcement resulted in poor overall outcomes.
Analysis of International Pools
As concerns about de-insurance in other countries, and the rising costs of reinsurance internationally (see indicator 11 above) have come to the fore, Flood Re undertook a project to see how other natural catastrophe schemes are performing under pressure. Undertaken by Swiss Re solutions, the resulting Analysis of International Pools project provided a deep dive into the performance of 5 comparable schemes to Flood Re – a summary version of the report has been posted on our website. This will help to inform consideration of the scheme’s viability over time, and has provided background for consultations with international colleagues, as many countries continue to seek Flood Re’s advice on how to establish a market-led scheme that embeds resilience features like Build Back Better. In September 2025, the UK will host the meeting of the World Forum of Catastrophe Programmes, and this comparison work will help inform the discussion among international colleagues.
